← Back to Group-IV

1. Portuguese (Pioneers of Sea Route)

Arrival

  • First Europeans to reach India by sea
  • Vasco da Gama arrived at Calicut on May 20, 1498
  • Started European era in India

Establishment

  • First factory at Calicut – 1502
  • First fort at Cochin – 1503

Key Leaders

  • Francisco de Almeida – First Governor, Blue Water Policy
  • Alfonso de Albuquerque – Captured Goa in 1510, real founder
  • Nino da Cunha – Shifted capital to Goa, acquired Diu and Bassein

Contributions

  • Introduced printing press in India (1557)
  • Introduced tobacco cultivation
  • Influenced Goan culture and architecture

Decline

  • Lost power due to competition
  • Remained in Goa, Diu, Daman till 1961

2. Dutch (Commercial Power)

Arrival

  • Dutch East India Company formed in 1602
  • Arrived in India in 1605

Establishment

  • First factory at Masulipatnam (1605)
  • Headquarters at Pulicat

Trade Goods

  • Indigo
  • Silk
  • Textiles
  • Saltpetre
  • Opium

Decline

  • Defeated by Travancore in 1741
  • Left India after Anglo-Dutch Treaty 1824

3. English (Traders to Rulers)

Arrival

  • East India Company established in 1600
  • Arrived at Surat in 1608

Establishment

  • Factory at Surat in 1613
  • Permission granted by Jahangir to Sir Thomas Roe

Expansion

  • Factories at Masulipatnam, Orissa, Hooghly
  • Acquired Calcutta villages in 1698
  • Built Fort William

Political Power

  • Battle of Plassey (1757)
  • Robert Clive defeated Siraj-ud-Daulah
  • Beginning of British rule

End of Company Rule

  • Ended after Revolt of 1857
  • British Crown took control in 1858

4. French (Last European Power)

Arrival

  • French East India Company founded in 1664
  • First factory at Surat in 1668

Major Centres

  • Pondicherry (Capital)
  • Chandernagore
  • Yanam
  • Mahe
  • Karaikal

Key Leader

  • Joseph François Dupleix
  • Fought Carnatic Wars

Decline

  • Defeated in Battle of Wandiwash (1760)
  • Lost political power

Key Takeaways

  • Order of Arrival: Portuguese → Dutch → English → French
  • Portuguese: Strong in Goa
  • Dutch: Trade-focused
  • English: Became rulers
  • French: Limited settlements
  • Turning Point: Battle of Plassey 1757

First Carnatic War (1746–1748)

Context

  • The war was a spillover of the Austrian War of Succession in Europe.

Course of the War

  • British Navy under Barnett captured French ships.
  • French Governor Dupleix sought help from Mauritius.
  • French fleet under La Bourdonnais defeated British fleet near Negapatam.
  • French captured Madras on September 21, 1746.
  • Nawab Anwar-ud-din sent army but lost at Battle of Adyar.
  • French failed to capture Fort St. David.
  • British besieged Pondicherry in 1748 but failed.

Outcome

  • Treaty of Aix-la-Chapelle (1748)
  • Madras returned to British.

Significance

  • First military experience of Robert Clive.
  • Showed superiority of European military tactics.

Second Carnatic War (1749–1754)

Context

  • Proxy war over succession disputes in Hyderabad and Carnatic.

Succession Disputes

Hyderabad

  • Nasir Jung vs Muzaffar Jung

Carnatic

  • Muhammad Ali vs Chanda Sahib

Alliances

  • French supported Muzaffar Jung and Chanda Sahib.
  • British supported Nasir Jung and Muhammad Ali.

Course of War

  • Anwar-ud-din killed at Battle of Ambur (1749).
  • Chanda Sahib became Nawab.
  • French installed Salabat Jung as Nizam.
  • French acquired Northern Circars.
  • Robert Clive captured Arcot (1751).
  • Turning point in war.
  • Muhammad Ali became Nawab.

Outcome

  • Treaty of Pondicherry (1754)
  • French recalled Dupleix.

Significance

  • Robert Clive emerged as brilliant commander.
  • French position weakened.

Third Carnatic War (1756–1763)

Context

  • Extension of Seven Years War in Europe.

Course of War

  • British captured Chandernagore (1757).
  • French captured Fort St. David.
  • Battle of Wandiwash (1760) decisive British victory.
  • British captured Pondicherry (1761).

Outcome

  • Treaty of Paris (1763).
  • French allowed only trading rights.
  • No political power.

Significance

  • Ended French ambitions in India.
  • Established British supremacy.

Key Takeaways

  • Wars were extensions of European conflicts.
  • French started interference in Indian politics.
  • British perfected political and military control.
  • Key leaders: Dupleix, Robert Clive, Eyre Coote.
  • Battle of Wandiwash decisive turning point.
  • British became dominant power in India.

Battle of Plassey (1757)

Context and Causes

Background

  • Siraj-ud-Daulah became Nawab of Bengal in 1756.
  • He was suspicious of British East India Company’s growing power.
  • British misused trade privileges and avoided paying taxes.
  • British fortified Calcutta without Nawab’s permission.

Immediate Trigger

  • Siraj-ud-Daulah attacked and captured Calcutta.
  • Followed by the controversial Black Hole Tragedy.

Course of the Battle

Forces

  • British army: About 3,000 soldiers led by Robert Clive.
  • Nawab’s army: About 50,000 soldiers, 40 cannons, and 10 war elephants.

The Conspiracy

  • Mir Jafar (Commander-in-Chief) betrayed Siraj-ud-Daulah.
  • Promised throne of Bengal by British.
  • Other conspirators:
    • Jagat Seth (Banker)
    • Rai Durlabh
    • Omichand

The Battle

  • Mir Jafar and other commanders did not fight.
  • Nawab’s army failed due to betrayal.
  • Siraj-ud-Daulah fled battlefield.
  • Battle lasted about 11 hours.

Outcome and Significance

Immediate Aftermath

  • Siraj-ud-Daulah was captured and killed.
  • Mir Jafar became puppet Nawab.

British Gains

  • Huge wealth from Bengal.
  • Zamindari rights of 24 Parganas.

Historical Significance

  • Foundation of British rule in India.
  • Gave British access to Bengal’s vast resources.
  • Helped finance further expansion.

Battle of Buxar (1764)

Context and Causes

Background

  • Mir Jafar replaced by Mir Qasim.
  • Mir Qasim tried to become independent.
  • Conflict over British misuse of dastaks (trade permits).
  • Mir Qasim shifted capital to Munger.

Alliance Against British

  • Mir Qasim (Nawab of Bengal)
  • Shuja-ud-Daula (Nawab of Awadh)
  • Shah Alam II (Mughal Emperor)

Course of the Battle

Forces

  • Indian alliance: About 40,000 soldiers.
  • British army: About 7,000–17,000 soldiers led by Hector Munro.

The Battle

  • British defeated combined Indian forces.
  • Main reason: Lack of coordination among Indian rulers.
  • Shuja-ud-Daula fled battlefield.

Outcome and Treaty of Allahabad (1765)

Aftermath

  • Mir Qasim fled and died later.
  • Shah Alam II surrendered.
  • Shuja-ud-Daula surrendered.

Treaty of Allahabad (1765)

  • Diwani Rights: British got revenue rights of Bengal, Bihar, Orissa.
  • British paid ₹26 lakh tribute to Mughal Emperor.
  • Awadh restored to Shuja-ud-Daula.
  • British Resident appointed in Awadh.
  • Mughal Emperor became pensioner of Company.

Significance

  • British became real rulers of Bengal.
  • Indian rulers lost political power.
  • Company gained administrative control.
  • Foundation of British Empire in India.

Key Takeaways

  • Plassey (1757): Beginning of British political control.
  • Buxar (1764): Confirmed British political and administrative control.
  • Plassey gave wealth.
  • Buxar gave legal authority (Diwani rights).
  • Robert Clive played major role.
  • Company transformed from traders to rulers.

1. Dual Government in Bengal (1765–1772)

What was Dual Government?

The Dual Government system was introduced by Robert Clive in 1765 after the Treaty of Allahabad. It was an administrative arrangement in which the British East India Company exercised real power without responsibility, while the Nawab had responsibility without real power.

Division of Power

Aspect Indian Hands (Nawab) British Hands (Company)
Administration Nizamat (Police and Judicial functions)
Revenue Diwani (Right to collect revenue)
Military Company controlled army
Key Authority Nawab (puppet ruler) Deputy Governor appointed by Company

Features

  • Company obtained Diwani rights of Bengal, Bihar, and Orissa.
  • Nawab retained Nizamat (law and order).
  • Deputy Governor Mohammad Reza Khan handled administration.
  • Company enjoyed power without responsibility.

Consequences and Failure

  • Complete administrative failure.
  • Heavy exploitation of peasants.
  • Revenue drained to Britain.
  • No welfare for people.
  • Abolished in 1772 by Warren Hastings.

2. Regulating Act of 1773

First attempt by British Parliament to regulate East India Company.

Key Provisions

Feature Description
Designation Change Governor of Bengal became Governor-General of Bengal
First Governor-General Lord Warren Hastings
Executive Council 4 member council created
Subordination Bombay and Madras made subordinate
Supreme Court Supreme Court established at Calcutta (1774)
Code of Conduct Officials banned from gifts and private trade
Reporting Company required to report to British Government

Drawbacks

  • Unclear powers between Court and Council
  • Governor-General lacked veto power
  • Weak control over presidencies
  • Led to Amending Act of 1781

3. Pitt's India Act of 1784

Passed by British Parliament to correct defects of Regulating Act.

Key Provisions

Feature Description
Board of Control Created to control political affairs
Court of Directors Controlled commercial affairs
Double Government Political control by Crown, commercial control by Company
Reduced Council Reduced from 4 members to 3 members
Governor-General Powers Greater authority in war, diplomacy, revenue
Subordination Madras and Bombay fully subordinate to Bengal
Terminology Company territories called British possessions in India

Significance

  • British government gained control
  • Company lost political independence
  • Clear separation of political and commercial roles

Drawbacks

  • Unclear division of authority
  • Governor-General had dual responsibility
  • Confusion in decision making
Summary

• Dual Government → Company had power without responsibility
• Regulating Act 1773 → First British control law
• Pitt's India Act 1784 → Crown gained real political control
• Beginning of centralized British administration in India

1. Drain of Wealth Theory

Definition

Drain of Wealth refers to the continuous transfer of India's wealth to England without adequate return. Dadabhai Naoroji explained this theory in 1867 and later in his book Poverty and Un-British Rule in India (1901).

Background

  • Before 1757: British brought bullion into India.
  • After Battle of Plassey: Wealth began flowing out of India.
  • Methods included:
    • Dastak (free trade passes)
    • Dastur (custom payments)
    • Nazarana (gifts)
    • Private trade monopolies

Six Causes of Drain (Dadabhai Naoroji)

No. Cause Explanation
1 Foreign Rule Foreign rulers had no interest in India's welfare
2 No Immigration No foreign capital investment in India
3 Administrative Costs India paid cost of British administration
4 War Expenses India paid cost of wars
5 Free Trade Policy Favored British goods
6 Remittances British officials sent money to England

Methods of Wealth Transfer

  • Home Charges
  • Salaries and pensions
  • Private remittances
  • Company profits
  • Interest payments
  • Unequal trade

Consequences

  • Capital shortage
  • Heavy taxation
  • Poverty
  • Famines
  • Economic stagnation

2. De-Industrialization (Destruction of Handicrafts)

Definition

Destruction of India's traditional handicrafts due to British policies and machine-made imports.

Statistics

Year India's Manufacturing Share
1800 19.7%
1860 8.6%
1913 1.4%

Causes

  • Discriminatory tariff policy
  • Machine-made British goods
  • Loss of royal patronage
  • Railway expansion
  • Heavy taxation

Industries Affected

Industry Impact
Cotton Most severely affected
Silk Collapsed
Jute Destroyed
Wool Declined

Consequences

  • Mass unemployment
  • Poverty
  • Loss of skills
  • Dependence on imports

3. Commercialization of Agriculture

Definition

Shift from food crops to cash crops for export under British rule.

Cash Crops

  • Indigo
  • Cotton
  • Jute
  • Tea
  • Opium

Examples

Region Crop Export Destination
Bengal Indigo Britain
Bombay Cotton England
Assam Tea Britain

Consequences

  • Food shortage
  • Famines
  • Peasant debt
  • Land loss
  • Poverty

Interconnection of All Three

  • Drain required export surplus
  • Commercialization enabled export crops
  • Destruction of handicrafts forced artisans into agriculture
  • India became raw material supplier
  • India imported finished goods
Summary

Drain of Wealth → Wealth transferred to Britain
De-Industrialization → Indian industries destroyed
Commercialization → Agriculture exploited

Result → Poverty, famines, and economic exploitation

Comparison of Land Revenue Systems in British India

Feature Permanent Settlement (Zamindari) Ryotwari System Mahalwari System
Introduced By Lord Cornwallis (1793) Thomas Munro (1820) Holt Mackenzie (1822); reformed by William Bentinck (1833)
Areas of Implementation Bengal, Bihar, Orissa, Varanasi, Northern Madras Madras, Bombay, Assam, Coorg North-West Frontier, Agra, Punjab, Central Province, Gangetic Valley
Coverage of British India Approximately 19% Approximately 51% Approximately 30%
Land Ownership Zamindars recognized as hereditary owners Peasants (Ryots) recognized as hereditary owners Village community (Mahal) collectively owned land
Revenue Collection Collected by Zamindars from peasants Directly collected from individual peasants Village headman (Lambardar) collected on behalf of community
Revenue Rate Fixed permanently; 10/11 to Company, 1/11 to Zamindar 50% (dry land), 60% (irrigated); revised periodically 66% (originally 95%) of rental value; revised periodically
Nature of Revenue Fixed in perpetuity Not fixed; revised every 20–30 years Not fixed; revised periodically
Intermediaries Zamindars acted as intermediaries No intermediaries (direct collection) Lambardar (village headman) acted as intermediary
Payment Mode Cash Cash Cash
Default Consequence Zamindari lands auctioned if revenue unpaid Peasants fell into debt traps; land alienation Land seized by moneylenders; village structure weakened
Exam-Oriented Summary:

• Permanent Settlement → Fixed revenue; Zamindars benefited
• Ryotwari → Direct settlement with peasants
• Mahalwari → Village-based settlement

Major Impact → Heavy taxation, peasant indebtedness, rural poverty